sim_background; homeostatic LTD term

Request or post your example code here
Post Reply
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2019 1:34 pm

sim_background; homeostatic LTD term

Post by k47h4 »


I was wondering whether equation 18 in Zenke et al. (2013) should be
A_i-(t) = ((A^+ * tau^+ * t^slow * kappa)/(tau^-)) * vbar_i(t)^2

So, whether the kappa should be in the numerator instead of in the denominator? Otherwise, the units don't match.

User avatar
Site Admin
Posts: 156
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2014 11:34 am
Location: Basel, CH

Re: sim_background; homeostatic LTD term

Post by zenke »

Hmm. So kappa should definitely be in the denominator. Is your question that all the units cancel leaving A^- unit-less and you would want it to have units to work in Eqn. (17)?
Post Reply