Hello,
I was wondering whether equation 18 in Zenke et al. (2013) should be
A_i-(t) = ((A^+ * tau^+ * t^slow * kappa)/(tau^-)) * vbar_i(t)^2
So, whether the kappa should be in the numerator instead of in the denominator? Otherwise, the units don't match.
Thanks
sim_background; homeostatic LTD term
Re: sim_background; homeostatic LTD term
Hmm. So kappa should definitely be in the denominator. Is your question that all the units cancel leaving A^- unit-less and you would want it to have units to work in Eqn. (17)?